-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CI] Remove coveralls #395
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR removes Coveralls integration from the CI workflow while maintaining code coverage reporting through Codecov. The changes are implemented by removing the Coveralls-specific steps from the GitHub Actions workflow file while preserving the core testing and coverage generation steps. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @surchs - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please fill out the 'Changes proposed' section in the PR description to document what is being changed and why Coveralls is being removed.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #395 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 98.36% 98.42% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 18 18
Lines 977 1016 +39
==========================================
+ Hits 961 1000 +39
Misses 16 16 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @surchs!
🍒 wdyt about using the [CI] prefix for this instead of [MNT]?
Changes proposed in this pull request:
Checklist
This section is for the PR reviewer
[ENH]
,[FIX]
,[REF]
,[TST]
,[CI]
,[MNT]
,[INF]
,[MODEL]
,[DOC]
) (see our Contributing Guidelines for more info)skip-release
(to be applied by maintainers only)Closes #XXXX
For new features:
For bug fixes:
Summary by Sourcery
CI: